CREATION BITS No 18.
How Did All the Human Races Develop?
|
Author: Curt Sewell |
Essays by
Author |
Before we can say how different races formed, we must first find what constitutes a race, and then see a little about how genetics operates. During the 1960's, many people began to try to eliminate racism and its prejudices. The A.A.A.S. convened a conference, attended by many experts in the field. Noted taxonomist Ernst Mayr said,
"... But if we look at
some recent textbooks on physical anthropology, we find that in one textbook
they recognize five human races, in the next textbook they recognize sixty-five
human races. Races there are; how to delimit them, how to draw the line between
them is not only difficult, it is impossible." (Ernst Mayr, in Science and
the Concept of Race, American Association for the Advancement of Science, New
York: Columbia University Press, 1968, page 16).
Speaking at the same conference, Bentley Glass said,
"Races are subdivisions
of a species. There is no real distinction between races, in the
anthropological or zoological sense, and subspecies. Races (or subspecies) are
always separated from each other in space or time. In other words,
contemporaneous races or subspecies always are separated from each other
geographically." (Bentley Glass, Science and the Concept of Race, page88.)
But how did different races form in the first place, if there was originally a large group of similar people? It's a well-known fact that if a few individuals from some much larger group are isolated, the variety within the small group's gene-pool is reduced. Some genes that are subordinate in most members of the original large group will be completely missing in the smaller group. Therefore, later generations from the small group, if left in isolation, will never develop some of the diversity of the original large group. Glass called this the "Founder's Effect," and explained:
"Small populations
therefore come to differ radically in their gene frequencies from the
populations of their origin ... Whenever a new colony is established by a very
few individuals, it cannot be fully and proportionately representative of the
gene pool from which it is drawn." (Glass, op.cit., page 91).
Darker or lighter skin is not caused directly by a person's being more or less exposed to intense sunlight. It's caused by the amount of a pigment caled melanin, and this is controlled by genetic factors. People with more melanin have darker skin, and this helps them be more resistent to skin cancers from intense sunlight. Natural selection tends to promote dark skin for those living in hot areas. On the other hand, people with less melanin can utilize the sun's rays to better produce vitamin D, which helps them to avoid rickets, and is needed in polar lattitudes. Thus natural selection tends to concentrate light-skinned people in the polar regions. In both cases, the lack of disease (cancer or rickets) selectively enhances people of certain color.
Noah and his family almost certainly had medium brown skin, and had a full complement of genes that included all that today's peoples have. But his descendants became isolated groups as they spread over the world. Each isolated group must have had fewer of certain recessive genes than some of the other groups; in time these became completely absent, so all members of that group would share an appearance different from other groups. In other words, they would become a different race.
This effect became especially enhanced after the dispersion following the Tower of Babel. At that time, God caused a confusion of languages and deliberate dispersion to far-off places for the various small groups. This isolation quickly caused differentiation of groups and proliferation of races.
We could formulate two general rules for formation or dissolution of races, as follows:
- If a small portion of an initially broad population is isolated for many generations, then a "race" is produced, because their gene pool is reduced in variety. Members of this race share common characteristics that are different from those of descendants of some different isolated group, whose gene pool has a different makeup.
- Conversely, if two "races" that had previously been isolated for many generations are brought together and then intermarry, later members of this newly merged broader society lose the sharp differences of the original races, and get characteristics that cover a wider range of shared average appearances. Their new gene pool shares from both original races.
SPECIATION
These principles, applied to non-humans, are proven daily by the work of plant or animal breeders. We know, for example, that each puppy in a litter born to a pair of pure-bred Irish Setters will look like an Irish Setter, but if the male happened to be a Beagle and the female an Irish Setter, the puppies will be mixed. They won't look alike, but will be some intermediate between the two breeds (or races). Professional breeders are careful to never allow interbreeding, because that could damage the purity of future generations.
This principle can be extended to the descendants of God's original creation. The Bible does not refer to "species" of animals, but rather to "kinds." A "kind" probably should correspond to either a Genus or a Family, in modern taxonomic terminology.
For example, there was probably a single pair of "dog kinds," from which all of the subspecies (or breeds) of domesticated dogs, most of the wolves, some foxes, and other species developed. This example helps to explain how Noah's ark could have held the ancestors of all of the land animals that have lived since then. At the time of the Flood there almost certainly were not as many species as we know now.
We've had many species become extinct since the Flood, but we've also had many new species develop. Speciation is a well-recognized action, and is not an evidence for evolution. Many of the now-extinct species had probably developed since the Flood, and later became victims of the changes in their environment. For example, the extinction of the dinosaurs was almost certainly caused by their difficulty in adapting to changes in environment. Creationists believe that the Great Flood of Noah, or its aftereffects, was the main cause of this drastic change. The widely-touted theory of an asteroid impact may well have an element of truth; it may have been the trigger for the Flood.
************************
While
we're on the subject of racial characteristics, let's respond to occasional
speculations about what Jesus looked like. This one is easy. Jesus was a
"sabra" Jew (or native Israeli), whose ancestry is documented in the
Bible all the way back to Adam and Eve. Even though He had no physical
descendants, there are a great many people today who have a similar genetic
background. So we can look at them and know that Jesus almost certainly had a
medium-olive complexion, dark curly hair, and a robust physique. (He was a
carpenter and an outdoorsman who walked almost everywhere He went). In
accordance with custom, He probably had a dark beard, neatly trimmed.
Although
most people have a mental image of "their Jesus," the important thing
to us is who He was, and what He said and did, not what He looked like.
Return to the top of this Essay
This page last updated 11/8/1999
Back to the Revolution Against Evolution home
page
The Creation
Bookstore
Revolution Against Evolution TV Show
Creation Essays
Seminars and Class Schedule
Online Books
Other online resources
Frequently Asked Questions
The Amy Foundation Website
Mount Hope Church
The Revolution Against Evolution has had over one million visitors since 4/28/97.
Hosted by DataRealm. Contact rae.org or send comments about this page HERE.